7 Rules to Write By, #5: Write a Strong Query

May 31st, 2013

photo-e1369952813420Here I am in New York (actually Brooklyn) yesterday morning, with my agent, Susan Golomb. Along with being a warm, lovely person and an insightful editor, Susan is a mega agent; her list includes Jonathan Franzen and Rachel Kushner. I did not get Susan to consider representing me because I knew any of these people … nor was I best friends with her cousin or her dog walker. Plus, I live in San Diego, about as far from New York as you can get and still be in the continental U.S. But I heard back from her – and from half of the 12 agents I approached – within a few weeks after sending a one-page query letter.

It was a really good query. And it took me about a year to write. My particular challenge was, how should I introduce my novel … with the contemporary story, which kicks off the action? with the historical story and its rich setting? with the spark for the book, a minor character in The Big Sleep? You’ll see that in the query I came up with, I actually managed to get all three of those things into the first paragraph. That did not happen in my first draft. Or my second or third.

Whatever your unique challenges, if you’ve written a novel of any complexity, you face the same core issues in writing a query: You need to reduce your novel of 75,000 words or more to one measly page in which you mention key characters, plot elements, and themes. And this radically pared-down piece of prose nevertheless needs to give a taste of your sparkling narrative voice. And, by the way, you want to throw in that you are willing to do the agent’s dishes for the rest of your life, or chauffeur her kid to school … except you restrain yourself and leave that part out.

But you’ve already made it through Rules 1-4. You’ve gone toward what scares you. You’ve done the work. You’ve been open to feedback, whether it’s just your own or you’ve been in a writers group. You’ve been a pro about revising. So you can handle …

Rule #5. Write a strong query.

Here are some tips.

Give your query the time it deserves. Write a draft. Then show it to people and get feedback. This goes even for those who aren’t into writers groups. Your query is a marketing document, and you need to know how it comes across. Once you get feedback, set the query aside and let the ideas simmer. Then go through the cycle – write, get feedback, and let simmer – again. And again.

By the way, for a novel, unless you’re a celebrity, you shouldn’t approach agents until you have a completed manuscript to send them. So you can start working on a query when you’re coming into the home stretch on your book.

Use basic query structure. You’ll probably find multiple, conflicting ideas about what that is. Here’s what I suggest:
– Introductory paragraph, which may start with some personal note about why you’re approaching this particular agent and then gives a capsule description of your book. You’ll notice that in mine, I slipped in the length of my ms., which is useful information and also let the agent know the book was completed.
– Plot summary – I’ve read that this should be just one paragraph; however, because of the historical and contemporary threads in my book, I did one for each thread.
– Relevant background about you.

Make it professional. In addition to the basics like demonstrating your familiarity with conventions of spelling and grammar, do not use a microscopically tiny font. In these days when most agents accept electronic queries, you can probably get away with going a teensy bit over one page. That does not, however, mean you can pack in three pages worth by using a 9-point instead of the standard 12-point font. It’s obvious.

Here’s the basic query I sent – often leading off with something specific to the agent I was approaching. By the way, you’ll notice that my working title for the book was not The Tin Horse. That happens.

***

I am seeking representation for An Intelligent Jewess, a literary novel (100,000 words) that was inspired by a marginal character in The Big Sleep, a keenly observant young woman described as having “the fine-drawn face of an intelligent Jewess.” Set primarily in the 1920s and 30s, my novel gives “the Jewess” a name, Elaine Greenstein, and takes place in her Los Angeles, the little-known Jewish immigrant mecca of Boyle Heights. And it explores her mysteries of identity and family—sparked by her discovery, at age eighty-five, of a clue to what happened to her twin sister, who disappeared when they were eighteen.

Born in 1921, Elaine grows up in Boyle Heights, a neighborhood east of downtown Los Angeles that was home to more than 75,000 Jews (site of the original Canter’s Deli and Max Factor’s barber shop) between the First and Second World Wars. Elaine’s Papa preaches the American Dream, despite being stuck as a salesman at Fine’s Fine Footwear, and Mama schemes to get money for her girls’ school outfits via her savvy at cards. Elaine feels her fiercest love and most bitter rivalry toward her fraternal twin, Barbara. Elaine is the brainy sister, Barbara a bold rule-breaker who shoplifts groceries to help their pal, Danny, during the Depression. Naturally, thrilling Barbara becomes Danny’s first love, while Elaine pines for him. Soon greater forces rip the childhood friends apart. At home in their Jewish enclave yet close to neighborhoods where rental signs say “No Jews or Dogs”—and hearing dire news from Europe—Danny embraces Zionism. Elaine is determined to be Jewish and American. And Barbara wants out. After a blowup when she and Elaine are eighteen, she flees and is never heard from again.

When my novel opens, Elaine is eighty-five. She has raised her children, buried her husband, and had a career as a leading progressive attorney (in The Big Sleep, the Jewess is reading a law book). Her life’s work is over. Then she stumbles on a decades-old clue to Barbara’s whereabouts. In contemporary chapters woven through the novel, she follows Barbara’s trail. But before Elaine can face her sister again, she must revisit their past.

Although An Intelligent Jewess is a literary novel, its spark came from my roots in mystery fiction. I am the author of five mysteries published by Berkley, including the Shamus-nominated Death in a City of Mystics, set in Israel. I am also an arts journalist and have published more than 300 articles in the San Diego Union-Tribune, Dance Magazine, and elsewhere.

Grandpa Tiny and the Priest’s Daughter or: Family Stories and Selective Memory

May 22nd, 2013

I love it when people say they figure the stories in The Tin Horse are based on my family stories, because they feel so authentic. Actually, most of the book is made up … except for one incident, in which Elaine’s grandfather, as a teenage boy in Ukraine, falls for a Christian girl and has to run for his life, with the girl’s brothers in hot pursuit. He has to swim across a river to get away.

My paternal grandfather, Philip Steinberg, came to America after getting into a romance with a Christian

Grandma and Grandpa Tiny's wedding, 1916

Grandma and Grandpa Tiny’s wedding, 1916

girl and needing to leave his village in Ukraine. And yes, there was a river he had to cross, though he didn’t have to swim; a good thing, since he didn’t know how to swim. That, as I remember it, is the story I heard from my cousin Kathy. Grandpa lived with Kathy’s family for several years, and she sought out his stories, so she’s the expert on Grandpa Tiny, so-named because the oldest cousin of my generation, Jeff, stumbled over “Grandpa Steinberg.” At least, that’s my version of the family lore of how Grandpa Tiny got that name. But of course, the passing on of family stories is a wonderfully subjective process, both in terms of who tells what to whom and what sticks in a given person’s mind.

Case in point: Kathy visited recently and told me about a juicy angle to the story of Grandpa Tiny and his Ukrainian girlfriend that I hadn’t been aware of … whether it wasn’t told to me earlier, or I just didn’t remember. Though I think this soap operatic detail would have stuck with me; I certainly would have used it. It turns out the girl wasn’t just a Ukrainian peasant, she was the daughter of a Russian Orthodox priest.

By the way, although Grandpa Tiny came at age 18, I never knew him to have an accent. And his written English was beautiful. At a party for his 75th birthday, I saw a poetic letter he’d written to my grandmother when they were courting. He recounted a dream in which they were walking in a garden together.

 

7 Rules to Write By – #4: Have the will and skill to revise

May 9th, 2013

It’s Jeff’s turn to be critiqued, and he’s doing everything right. He listens carefully, taking notes. He doesn’t argue or try to explain; he gets it that if people are confused by what’s on the page, he needs to fix it on the page. He notices when several people bring up the same issue. But then, the next time he’s up for critique, he presents a revision of the work he showed last time. And almost nothing has changed! The material may read a bit more smoothly, but it still has the same fundamental problems of structure or characterization or story logic that it had before.

If you’ve spent any time in writing workshops or critique groups, you’ve probably seen this happen. Or maybe you’ve been Jeff. You genuinely valued a number of the comments at the first critique session and did your best to work with them, and then you heard from the group that they saw no substantial improvements.

Revision is the territory that separates the professionals from the amateurs. First, you need to be willing to make changes based on feedback from a trusted teacher or group … and, down the road, from an agent or editor – and serious writers are. But it takes more than a professional attitude to revise effectively. You have to know how to do it. That’s why rule #4 is:

Have the will and skill to revise.

 Comments on one’s writing tend to be diagnostic – “this is a problem” – rather than prescriptive – “here’s how to fix it.” That’s good; it’s your story. But how do you take those diagnostic comments and use them to bring more clarity and power to your writing? Here are some tips.

* Resist the temptation to jump in and start revising the minute you come home after being critiqued. Give feedback at least 24 hours to settle.

* Go over what you brought home from the critique session – your notes, written comments from the group, maybe a recording – and look for two things:

– Where do several people raise the same issue?

– What resonates for you? It may be a comment from just one person, but it’s the person whose judgment you trust the most, or it just rang true.

Those are the areas to work on.

* What happens next depends on what level of revision is required. Some suggestions are at the micro level of changing a few words or tightening a scene. Easy-peasy, right? You can dive right in. But often, when someone does a revision in which not enough changes, it’s because s/he needed to work on an intermediate or even a macro level.

* An intermediate revision might involve such things as fleshing out a character or plot element, building a relationship, changing the sequence of scenes, or weaving material into the early chapters to establish motivation for an action taken halfway into the book. If you need to do this more complex level of revision, be aware that whatever you’ve already written has a certain authority simply by being on the page. If you just open your document and start writing, there’s a good chance you won’t go deeply enough. I suggest doing some prep writing away from the page, for instance:

– character sketches

– free writing from a character’s point of view

– scene analysis: taking apart a scene and writing what each character is thinking and feeling moment to moment, as well as what they say. Robert McKee in Story (p. 154) gives a terrific example of this process in his analysis of a scene from “Chinatown.” (Story, while aimed at screenwriters has some great information for novelists, even if you do sometimes want to throw the book across the room.)

– structural analysis: working with your outline – or making an outline, if you hadn’t before – to consider changes in sequence or plan where you want to deepen or add new material. For instance, you might have Cathy mangle her sister’s thumb in an accident in chapter 3, a guilt-inducing event that will help readers understand why, years later, she puts up with her sister’s demands. BTW, as a general rule, it’s good to make your characters suffer.

* What if you literally have to do a re-vision, to take a completely fresh look at some macro aspect of the SANYO DIGITAL CAMERAfictional world you’ve created? If you’re contemplating large-scale changes, you can use the same prep writing techniques as for an intermediate revision – character sketches, scene analysis, etc. Having an outline can be essential, if you need to consider different approaches to structure, sequence of events, and when various characters will come on the scene.

For a macro revision, you also need time – weeks or even (gulp) months in which a new vision can take shape strongly enough to hold its own against the concrete reality of what’s already on the page. And changes at this level aren’t isolated to a single chapter or scene; they send out ripples. For instance, my fabulous editor at Random House asked me to take a different approach to the contemporary chapters that are about one-quarter of The Tin Horse. I spent two months doing character sketches and free writing, playing with my outline, and just letting ideas percolate. One of the biggest changes I eventually made was to move the entrance of one character from chapter 17 back to chapter 4, and the ripples extended through the entire novel: I needed to develop that character more and weave her into the contemporary story from chapter 4 on; and her expanded presence revealed surprising aspects of my main character, Elaine.

Trying for this deep a re-vision may feel terrifying. Fantastic! Remember Rule #1 of 7 Rules to Write By: Go toward what scares you. The scary places will bring out your best work.

* One last thing: Save your old draft.

The Urge for Going: Is it in Americans’ DNA?

May 2nd, 2013
My maternal grandmother's family, the Antons, shortly after they came to Milwaukee from Ukraine. My grandma is the tiny baby.

My grandmother’s family, the Antons, shortly after they came to Milwaukee from Ukraine. My grandma is the baby.

I visited a book group recently, and one of the members, Cheryl, brought up an idea I’ve been thinking about ever since. We were discussing the way several people in The Tin Horse make precipitous departures, leaving behind family, home, and everything they know, and she pointed out that many of us in America are just a few generations away from immigrants or may even be immigrants ourselves. Someone in our recent genetic past made a choice between, on one side, the deep pull of the familiar/fear of the unknown, and, on the other, a spirit of adventure and maybe a sense of constriction at whatever their family or village expected them to become. Their brothers or sisters may have weighed the same choices and decided to stay put, but our ancestors gave in to–to quote Joni Mitchell, who provided the sound track for a time in my life when I was running as fast as I could from expectations–”the urge for going.”

Cheryl raised the question: Is escape in Americans’ DNA? Do we have a genetic predisposition to strike out for the frontier? I’m writing this from the lower left corner of the country, 2000 miles from where I grew up. And I’d love to hear what people think.